The subject of swirling rumors and debates for many months, the worst-kept secret in the photography world finally saw the light of day today: Nikon finally announced the first “prosumer” (my term) full-frame DSLR, the D600.
Before we talk about the specs, lets talk about the price. Many rumors put it as low as $1500. I guessed it to be Euros and put it at $1899 or $1999. All of that was wrong – the price is $2099. That places it at the same price as the D700 did once the D800 came out, and potentially leaves enough room underneath for a D300s replacement. On the whole, I think it is a good price but not a great price. An additional $900 gets you to a D800, which will make a lot of people think (personally, I think the D800 is under-priced).
As for specs, they are pretty much what everyone thought:
- 24.3 Megapixel FX (full frame) sensor, producing images as large as 6,016 x 4,016
- 5.5 Frames per second
- ISO 100-6400
- 39-point autofocus system with 9 cross-type sensors
- Dual SD slots
- Built-in screw drive for non-AFS lenses (in other words, lenses that don’t have a built-in motor)
- U1/U2 user-definable presets like the D7000
- 3.2″ screen, 921,000-pixel screen
- 1/4000 maximum shutter speed
- 1/200 flash sync
Those last two have a lot of people up in arms, and frankly I can’t see why. This is a camera for the enthusiast. A body for the serious amateur photographer seeking the low light performance offered by a full-frame sensor. With ISO 100 and 1/4000, it covers a similar range as the D700 with a base ISO of 200 with a 1/8000 shutter. Want both ISO 100 and a 1/8000 shutter? Welcome to the D800.
Ergonomics and autofocus are virtually identical to the D7000, which is a good thing. I’ve read some reports of the D7000 not working well with superzooms (think 600mm prime lenses as long as your arm), but I don’t see why people who own one of those lenses are going to shoot a D600. All the lenses the target customers will want to use will work perfectly on the D600. Ergonomics are classic Nikon, which is a good thing. Personally, I much prefer the handling of my D300s over the D7000, but it offers a great combination for the novice and advanced shooter.
Since we don’t have comparisons, ISO performance and other figures, it is hard to compare the D600 to anything and come to a full conclusion. But it is probably very good. Nikon hasn’t laid an egg in a long time (I don’t count the D800 focus issues, since that is a quality control escape, not a product design issue), and this is a new category for them: They’ll hit the ball pretty hard and it will be a winner.
Should you buy one? Harder to say. It isn’t cheap. You only get partial function from your DX lenses if you have any (there is a DX-mode that lets you shoot DX lenses, but I’d like to see it in use before I say that is something you’d live with happily…). If you don’t have any lenses, your bill for FX glass is generally going to be higher than DX. At 24MP, your holding technique had better be pretty good or it is going to show up big-time in your photos. 24MP is going to mean bigger cards, more hard drive space and chew up some performance on your PC.
Low-light performance should be strong, and a well-executed image is likely to be very, very good.
If the money isn’t a big deal, I’d say you can’t go wrong. FX at this price point is a bargain, and you’ll get plenty of help from the camera to get great images. But like my last post, I don’t ever want to have a great camera and poor lenses. Being glass-poor is going to make any camera look bad. Great glass is going to give you wonderful results even from a limited camera.
You might have noticed I haven’t mentioned video. Call me a curmudgeon, but I have no desire for video on my DSLR, and frankly I don’t know enough about it to offer perspective or opinions. I’m sure the internet has no lack of those for the video features.
I’m sure a lot of you will be happy owners of a D600, and it is likely to be a big success for Nikon. As for me, I’m focusing on the equipment I have, and looking at the blank spot in Nikon’s product line where the D300s used to be. If I was going full-frame, I’d be strongly tempted to pick up a used D700, but I’m a happy DX guy at this point.
So what do you think about the announcement, the price and the camera?