[Note: If you’ve found this page via a search engine, you might want to check out my rant on JPEG vs. RAW and Ken’s positions on the topic…]
I’m not even going to link this one, because I’m aggravated. I’d even discourage you from going to his site to look. Here’s the net: As part of commentary on the recent sale of a photo for an astounding $4.3M, Ken has made the statement in one of his most recent posts that if it isn’t captured on film, it isn’t art. He goes on to say that he isn’t aware of any iconic photo created on a digital camera.
He also has a post insinuating that you’re a pansy (well, that isn’t the word he uses, but I’m sure you’re getting the idea) if you think new equipment will improve your photography.
I know what I think, but I’m interested in hearing what you think. Comments? Thoughts? Opinions?